Journal of Surgical Radiology
2026, Volume 5, Issue 6 : 42-48 doi: 10.61336/JSR/26-6-06
Research Article
MRI Evaluation of Common Peroneal and Posterior Tibial Nerve Injuries and Their Association with Ligamentous Injuries in Traumatic Knee Using Conventional MRI Sequences
 ,
 ,
 ,
1
Fellow in Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, Dr. Dy Patil Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune.
2
Professor, Department of Radiology, Dr. Dy Patil Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune.
3
Fellow in Women’s Imaging, Department of Radiology, Dr. Dy Patil Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune.
4
Professor and Head of Department, Department of Radiology, Dr. Dy Patil Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune.
Received
May 2, 2026
Revised
May 26, 2026
Accepted
May 24, 2026
Published
June 1, 2026
Abstract

Traumatic knee injuries frequently involve complex damage to ligaments, meniscal, and osseous structures. Peripheral nerve injuries, particularly involving the common peroneal nerve (CPN) and posterior tibial nerve (PTN), are often under-recognized on routine knee MRI despite their significant clinical implications. Purpose: To determine the prevalence of CPN and PTN injuries in traumatic knee cases and to evaluate their association with ligamentous and meniscal injuries using conventional MRI sequences. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 200 patients who underwent MRI for acute or subacute traumatic knee injuries. MRI examinations were performed on a 3-Tesla scanner using standard knee protocols without dedicated MR neurography. The CPN and PTN were assessed for signal alteration, enlargement, fascicular disruption and associated muscle denervation changes. Ligamentous injuries (ACL, PCL, MCL, LCL, and posterolateral corner) and meniscal injuries were systematically evaluated and graded. Associations between nerve injuries and ligamentous or meniscal pathology were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests. Results: The study population showed male predominance (61%) with a mean age of 36.74 ± 13.36 years, most commonly affecting the 21–30-year age group. ACL injuries were the most frequent ligamentous injuries (85%), followed by MCL (43%), LCL (30.5%), and PCL (25%). Medial and lateral meniscal injuries predominantly involved the posterior horn, with Grade II tears being most common. CPN injury was more prevalent than PTN injury, with mild, moderate, and severe CPN injuries identified in 29.5%, 18.0%, and 2.0% of patients, respectively. PTN injuries were less frequent and predominantly mild. CPN injuries showed a strong association with lateral compartment and posterolateral corner injuries. Conclusions: Conventional knee MRI sequences are effective in detecting clinically significant CPN and PTN injuries when a systematic nerve evaluation is performed. Routine assessment of peripheral nerves, particularly the CPN, should be emphasized in traumatic knee MRI to facilitate early diagnosis and optimize patient management.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Traumatic injuries of the knee are common and frequently involve complex damage to ligamentous, meniscal, osseous, and soft-tissue structures. While ligamentous injuries such as anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), collateral ligaments, and posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries are routinely evaluated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), associated peripheral nerve injuries are often under-recognized in routine imaging practice. Among these, the common peroneal nerve (CPN) and posterior tibial nerve (PTN) are particularly vulnerable in knee trauma due to their close anatomical relationship with the fibular neck, posterolateral structures, and posterior compartment of the knee. Failure to identify nerve involvement may result in delayed diagnosis, inappropriate management, and poor functional outcomes, including persistent motor deficits and sensory impairment.[1–3]

Peripheral nerve injuries following trauma are traditionally classified using the Seddon and Sunderland grading systems, which describe a spectrum ranging from transient conduction block (neurapraxia) to complete nerve transection (neurotmesis).[4,5] Although clinical examination and electrophysiological studies remain important, they have limitations in early injury detection and in differentiating the severity of nerve damage, particularly in the acute and subacute stages. MRI has emerged as a valuable non-invasive modality for evaluating peripheral nerve injuries by demonstrating nerve enlargement, altered signal intensity, fascicular disruption, perineural edema, and secondary muscle denervation changes.[6,7] While magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) provides high-resolution nerve imaging, conventional MRI sequences, which are widely available in routine knee protocols, have been shown to reliably detect clinically significant nerve injuries.[8]

The common peroneal nerve is especially susceptible to injury in knee trauma, particularly in association with posterolateral corner injuries, multiligamentous injuries, and fibular head fractures. Recent MRI-based studies have demonstrated a significant prevalence of CPN abnormalities in acute and subacute PLC injuries, emphasizing the need for systematic evaluation of the nerve during knee MRI interpretation.[9,10] MRI can also identify denervation changes in the anterior and lateral compartment muscles, which serve as indirect but sensitive indicators of nerve injury, often preceding definitive electrophysiological findings.[11] In contrast, injury to the posterior tibial nerve in knee trauma has been less frequently studied, despite its potential involvement in high-energy injuries and posterior knee compartment trauma.

Given the increasing reliance on MRI for comprehensive assessment of traumatic knee injuries, there is a growing need to emphasize routine evaluation of peripheral nerves using standard MRI sequences and to understand their association with ligamentous injuries. The present study aimed  to evaluate MRI features of common peroneal and posterior tibial nerve injuries in patients with traumatic knee injuries and to analyze their association with concomitant ligamentous injuries using regular MRI sequences, thereby highlighting the importance of integrated nerve assessment in routine knee MRI reporting.

Methodology

This retrospective observational study was conducted by a 20 years experienced musculoskeletal radiologist on 200 patients who underwent MRI of the knee for evaluation of traumatic knee injuries during the study period. Patients with a history of acute or subacute knee trauma and availability of complete MRI examinations were included in the study. Exclusion criteria comprised prior knee surgery, known peripheral neuropathy unrelated to trauma, space-occupying lesions around the knee, inflammatory arthropathy, or suboptimal MRI studies that precluded adequate evaluation. Demographic details including age and sex were recorded for all patients. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and patient confidentiality was maintained throughout the study.

MRI examinations were performed using standard knee MRI protocols on a 3 Tesla MRI scanner and included conventional sequences such as axial, sagittal, and coronal T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and fat-suppressed or short tau inversion recovery (STIR) images. No dedicated magnetic resonance neurography sequences were used. The common peroneal nerve was evaluated along its course in the popliteal fossa, at the fibular neck .while the posterior tibial nerve was assessed in the posterior compartment of the knee and proximal leg. Nerve injury was identified based on abnormal nerve enlargement, altered signal intensity on fluid-sensitive sequences, loss of normal fascicular architecture, perineural edema, and indirect evidence of injury in the form of muscle denervation changes. Where applicable, nerve injuries were categorized according to imaging correlates of the Seddon and Sunderland classification systems into neurapraxia, axonotmesis, or neurotmesis.

Associated ligamentous injuries—including anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, medial collateral ligament, lateral collateral ligament, and posterolateral corner structures—were systematically evaluated and documented. Meniscal injuries involving the medial and lateral menisci were assessed for presence and grade. The prevalence of common peroneal and posterior tibial nerve injuries was calculated. Associations between nerve injuries and ligamentous or meniscal injuries were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests, including the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using standard statistical software.

 

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients with traumatic knee injuries were included in the study. The age–sex distribution is summarized in Table 1. The study population comprised 122 males (61.0%) and 78 females (39.0%), indicating male predominance. The most affected age group was 21–30 years, accounting for 115 patients (57.5%), followed by 31–40 years (33 patients; 16.5%) and 41–50 years (26 patients; 13.0%). Patients aged <20 years and 51–60 years constituted 7.5% and 5.5%, respectively. Descriptive statistics for age are presented in Table 2. The overall mean age was 36.74 ± 13.36 years. Males had a mean age of 35.03 ± 13.81 years, while females were slightly older with a mean age of 39.41 ± 12.25 years.

Table 1. Age-sex distribution:

Age (years)

Gender

Total

Male

Female

n

%

n

%

n

%

<20

12

6.0%

3

1.5%

15

7.5%

21-30

74

37.0%

41

20.5%

115

57.5%

31-40

15

7.5%

18

9.0%

33

16.5%

41-50

14

7.0%

12

6.0%

26

13.0%

51-60

7

3.5%

4

2.0%

11

5.5%

Total

122

61.0%

78

39.0%

200

100.0%

 

Table 2. Descriptive statistics for age (years):

Gender

N

Mean

SD

Male

122

35.03

13.81

Female

78

39.41

12.25

Total

200

36.74

13.36

MRI-based grading and frequency of ligament injuries are detailed in Table 3. ACL injuries were the most common, identified in 170 patients (85.0%), with Grade I tears being the predominant pattern (44.5%), followed by Grade III (20.0%) and Grade II (19.5%) injuries; avulsion was rare (1.0%). PCL injuries were observed in 50 patients (25.0%), most commonly Grade I (17.5%). MCL injuries were present in 86 patients (43.0%), with a notable proportion of avulsion injuries (21.5%). LCL injuries were detected in 61 patients (30.5%), predominantly Grade I (26.0%), with no Grade III tears or avulsions identified.

 Table 3. MRI-Based Grading and Frequency of ACL, PCL, MCL, and LCL Injuries in Traumatic Knee:

 

ACL Injury

PCL Injury

MCL Injury

LCL Injury

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

Grade I

89

44.5%

35

17.5%

23

11.5%

52

26.0%

Grade II

39

19.5%

3

1.5%

10

5.0%

9

4.5%

Grade III

40

20.0%

8

4.0%

10

5.0%

0

0.0%

Avulsion

2

1.0%

4

2.0%

43

21.5%

0

0.0%

Total

170

85.0%

50

25.0%

86

43.0%

61

30.5%

 

The grade and location distribution of medial meniscal injuries is shown in Table 4. Among 106 medial meniscal tears, Grade II injuries were most frequent (53.8%), followed by Grade III (23.6%) and Grade IV (15.1%). The posterior horn was the most commonly involved site (85 cases), whereas root involvement was less frequent (5 cases), predominantly with Grade IV tears.

Lateral meniscal injuries (Table 5) were identified in 51 cases. Grade II tears were most common (72.5%), followed by Grade III (15.7%) and Grade IV (7.8%). Similar to the medial meniscus, the posterior horn was the most frequently involved location.

Table 4. Grade × Location Distribution of Medial Meniscal Injuries (N = 106):

 

Grade

Posterior Horn

Anterior Horn

Body

Root

Total

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

Grade I

5

5.9%

1

11.1%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

6

5.7%

Grade II

48

56.5%

4

44.4%

5

55.6%

0

0.0%

57

53.8%

Grade III

20

23.5%

2

22.2%

2

22.2%

1

20.0%

25

23.6%

Grade IV

12

14.1%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

4

80.0%

16

15.1%

Total

85

100.0%

9

100.0%

9

100.0%

5

100.0%

106

100.0%

                       

 

Table 5. Grade × Location Distribution of Lateral Meniscal Injuries (N = 106)

 

Grade

Posterior Horn

Anterior Horn

Body

Root

Total

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

Grade I

0

0.0%

1

6.7%

1

20.0%

0

0.0%

2

3.9%

Grade II

23

79.3%

10

66.7%

4

80.0%

0

0.0%

37

72.5%

Grade III

6

20.7%

2

13.3%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

8

15.7%

Grade IV

0

0.0%

2

13.3%

0

0.0%

2

100.0%

4

7.8%

Total

29

100.0%

15

100.0%

5

100.0%

2

100.0%

51

100.0%

                       

Selected MRI findings and peripheral nerve injuries are summarized in Table 6. Common peroneal nerve (CPN) injury was more frequent than posterior tibial nerve involvement, with mild CPN injury seen in 59 patients (29.5%), moderate in 36 (18.0%), and severe in 4 (2.0%). Posterior tibial nerve (PTN) injury was identified as mild in 18 patients (9.0%) and moderate in 2 patients (1.0%).
Associated findings included popliteal tendon (POP T) injuries (Grade I: 4.0%, Grade II: 1.5%), popliteofibular ligament injuries (Grade I: 6.0%, Grade II: 2.5%), and lateral compartment fluid (23.0%). Joint effusion was common, noted as mild in 44.0% and moderate in 24.5% of patients.

 

Table 6. Distribution of Selected MRI Findings and Peripheral Nerve Injuries in Traumatic Knee:

 

n

%

Popliteus Tendon

Grade I

8

0.04

Grade II

3

0.015

Lateral Compartment Fluid

Mild

46

0.23

Popliteal fibular Ligament

Grade I

12

0.06

Grade II

5

0.025

Nerve injury - PTN

Mild

18

0.09

Moderate

2

0.01

Nerve injury - CPN

Mild

59

0.295

Moderate

36

0.18

Severe

4

0.02

Joint Effusion

Mild

88

0.44

Moderate

49

0.245

The distribution of osseous injuries and associated MRI findings is presented in Table 7. Marrow contusions without fracture were observed in 30 patients (15.0%), with a predominance of lateral compartment–predominant contusions (13.0%), followed by medial compartment–predominant (7.0%) and bicompartmental contusions (5.0%). Among fractures, the most common sites were the tibia/tibial condyle/tibial plateau (6.0%), followed by the fibular head/fibula (4.0%), femoral condyle (3.0%), and patella (2.5%); combined tibia–fibula fractures accounted for 2.0%. Additional MRI findings included chondromalacia patella across all grades, most frequently Grade IV (3.0%), followed by Grade I (2.5%), Grade II (2.0%), and Grade III (1.0%). Other less frequent findings included medial retinacular injury, popliteus tendon injury, ganglion cyst of the popliteus tendon, posterior femoral exostosis, and mucoid degeneration of the ACL, each observed in 0.5% of cases.

Table 7. Distribution of Osseous Injuries and Associated MRI Findings in Traumatic Knee:

 

 

n

%

Osseous Injury Category

Marrow contusion without fracture

30

15.0%

Lateral compartment–predominant contusions (lateral femoral/tibial condyle)

26

13.0%

Medial compartment–predominant contusions

14

7.0%

Bicompartmental contusions

10

5.0%

Fracture Site

Tibia / Tibial condyle / Tibial plateau

12

6.0%

Fibular head / fibula

8

4.0%

Femoral condyle

6

3.0%

Patella

5

2.5%

Combined tibia–fibula fractures

4

2.0%

Additional findings

Chondromalacia patella Grade I

5

2.5%

Chondromalacia patella Grade II

4

2.0%

Chondromalacia patella Grade III

2

1.0%

Chondromalacia patella Grade IV

6

3.0%

Medial retinacular injury (Grade I)

1

0.5%

Popliteus tendon injury (Grade I)

1

0.5%

Ganglion cyst – popliteus tendon

1

0.5%

Posterior femoral exostosis

1

0.5%

Mucoid degeneration of ACL

1

0.5%

 

 

 

 

DISCUSSION

Traumatic injuries of the knee often result in complex involvement of ligamentous, meniscal, osseous, and neurovascular structures. In the present study, traumatic knee injuries were most frequently observed in young adults with a male predominance, reflecting exposure to high-energy mechanisms such as road traffic accidents and sports-related trauma. Ligamentous injuries, particularly involving the ACL, MCL, and posterolateral corner (PLC), were common. Previous biomechanical and anatomical studies have demonstrated that the PLC plays a critical role in resisting varus stress, external rotation, and posterior tibial translation, making it particularly vulnerable in high-energy trauma.[1–3] The frequent coexistence of ligamentous injuries in our cohort highlights the need for comprehensive MRI assessment beyond isolated ligament evaluation.

A key finding of this study is the higher prevalence of common peroneal nerve (CPN) injury compared to posterior tibial nerve (PTN) injury. This observation is anatomically and biomechanically well explained. The CPN is tethered around the fibular neck and lies in close proximity to the PLC structures, including the fibular collateral ligament and popliteus tendon, rendering it susceptible to traction and compression during PLC and multiligamentous injuries.[3,10] Previous MRI-based studies have similarly demonstrated a strong association between acute and subacute PLC injuries and CPN abnormalities, even in the absence of overt clinical neuropathy.[8,9] In contrast, PTN injuries were less frequent and generally milder, consistent with its deeper location and relative protection within the posterior compartment.

Peripheral nerve injury classification in this study was guided by MRI correlates of the Seddon and Sunderland grading systems, which describe a spectrum from neurapraxia to neurotmesis.[4,5] Advances in imaging have enabled MRI and MR neurography to bridge the gap between clinical examination and electrophysiological testing by allowing direct visualization of nerve signal alteration, enlargement, fascicular disruption, and perineural edema.[6,7] Importantly, our study demonstrates that conventional knee MRI sequences, without dedicated MR neurography, were sufficient to identify clinically relevant nerve injuries. This finding is in agreement with prior literature emphasizing the applicability of routine MRI in early diagnosis of CPN injury, particularly in traumatic settings.[7–9]

Muscle signal alterations observed in this study were predominantly traumatic in nature, with only a small proportion suggestive of denervation-related edema. MRI features of muscle denervation, including diffuse T2 hyperintensity with preserved muscle architecture in the acute stage, have been well described and are valuable indirect markers of nerve injury.[11] The limited number of denervation-pattern changes in our cohort likely reflects early imaging in the acute or subacute phase of trauma. Recognition of such patterns is clinically important, as early identification of nerve injury can influence prognosis, guide surgical planning, and prevent delayed diagnosis leading to persistent functional deficits. Overall, the findings of this study underscore the importance of systematic evaluation of peripheral nerves, particularly the CPN, during routine knee MRI, especially in the presence of PLC or lateral compartment injuries.

CONCLUSION

Traumatic knee injuries are frequently associated with peripheral nerve involvement, particularly of the common peroneal nerve, which is often linked to posterolateral corner and lateral compartment injuries. Conventional knee MRI sequences are effective in detecting clinically relevant nerve injuries when a systematic evaluation of nerve anatomy and signal changes is performed. Early recognition of associated nerve, ligamentous, and meniscal injuries on routine MRI is essential for appropriate management and improved functional outcomes.

 Declarations:

  • abbreviations: PTN(Posterior tibial nerve) , CPN(common peroneal nerve),ACL(Anterior cruciate ligament), PCL(posterior cruciate ligament),LCL(lateral collateral ligament), MCL(medial collateral ligament),
  • Intitutional ethics sub committee as provided the waiver letter which as been uploaded in the related file category. Institute name : Dr DY Patil Medical College and Research centre. The study was done in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration. Informed Consent from everyone was taken at the time of starting the MRI procedure.
  • Consent for publication:  identifying images or other personal or clinical details of participants are not presented in the study and steps taken not to compromise anonymity
  • Availability of data and materials: complete data collected to make this paper is provided in the form of excel sheet and is attached in additional supporting files
  • Competing Interests: none
  • Funding: self funded
  • Acknowledgements: not applicable
REFERENCES
  1. LaPrade RF, Johansen S, Wentorf FA, Engebretsen L, Esterberg JL, Tso A. An analysis of an anatomical posterolateral knee reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical study and development of a surgical technique. Am. J. Sports Med. 2004;32:1405–14.
  2. Fanelli GC, Edson CJ. Posterior cruciate ligament injuries in trauma patients: Part II. Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. Off. Publ. Arthrosc. Assoc. N. Am. Int. Arthrosc. Assoc. 1995;11:526–9.
  3. Terry GC, LaPrade RF. The posterolateral aspect of the knee. Anatomy and surgical approach. Am. J. Sports Med. 1996;24:732–9.
  4. Seddon HJ. THREE TYPES OF NERVE INJURY. Brain 1943;66:237–88.
  5. Sunderland S. A classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function. Brain J. Neurol. 1951;74:491–516.
  6. Chhabra A, Ahlawat S, Belzberg A, Andreseik G. Peripheral nerve injury grading simplified on MR neurography: As referenced to Seddon and Sunderland classifications. Indian J. Radiol. Imaging 2014;24:217–24.
  7. Goyal A, Wadgera N, Srivastava DN, Ansari MT, Dawar R. Imaging of traumatic peripheral nerve injuries. J. Clin. Orthop. Trauma 2021;21:101510.
  8. Choi GY, Yang J, Cho Y, Choi H, Jeon J, Kang S. Applicability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Early Diagnosis of Common Peroneal Neuropathy. The Nerve 2021;7:36–40.
  9. Marconi GF, Simão MN, Fogagnolo F, Nogueira-Barbosa MH. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of common peroneal nerve injury in acute and subacute posterolateral corner lesion: a retrospective study. Radiol. Bras. 2021;54:303–10.
  10. LaPrade RF, Ly TV, Wentorf FA, Engebretsen L. The posterolateral attachments of the knee: a qualitative and quantitative morphologic analysis of the fibular collateral ligament, popliteus tendon, popliteofibular ligament, and lateral gastrocnemius tendon. Am. J. Sports Med. 2003;31:854–60.
  11. Kamath S, Venkatanarasimha N, Walsh MA, Hughes PM. MRI appearance of muscle denervation. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37:397–404.
Recommended Articles
Research Article
“Clinical Profile and Surgical Outcome of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study in Tertiary care Centre of Gujarat”
Published: 20/09/2024
Loading Image...
Volume 5, Issue 6
Citations
65 Views
30 Downloads
Share this article
© Copyright ©Surgissphere Corporation